The Federal High Court in Abuja, led by Justice James Omotosho, has fixed November 20 for judgment in the seven-count terrorism case against Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).
The date was scheduled after Kanu failed to use the six days granted by the court to open his defence. Instead of presenting his case on Friday, November 7, Kanu—who is now representing himself after dismissing his legal team—filed a new motion challenging both the validity of the charges and the court’s jurisdiction.
In his motion, Kanu argued that his trial is anchored on a law that no longer exists, claiming that the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act under which he is being prosecuted has been repealed.
Justice Omotosho opted to move directly to judgment due to Kanu’s repeated refusal to enter his defence. The judge had earlier given him a final opportunity to do so, warning that the defence would be closed if he failed to comply.
By filing a motion instead of presenting a defence, the court deemed that Kanu had effectively waived his right to respond to the allegations on their merits.
This marks a pivotal stage in the high-profile and politically charged case, with the November 20 judgment expected to determine the fate of the separatist leader.
0 Comments